🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.